
AI can write a sales email in five seconds flat. That is the easy part. The hard part is that your prospect can tell when you didn't read it. Raw AI text sounds smooth and says nothing. The fix is simple. Treat the AI draft as a first draft, never the final one. Edit it, and it works for you instead of against you.
There are two ways to get this wrong, and both hurt. The first is sending AI text without reading it. You copy, you paste, you hit send. Now your buyer is reading the same generic lines they got from ten other reps this week. The second mistake is the opposite. You refuse to touch AI at all, so you write everything slow and from scratch while faster reps lap you. Neither one wins. The trick is to use the tool, then own the output.
Good sellers treat AI like a fast junior helper, not a final author. They ask it for a draft, then they make it theirs. They cut the fluff. They swap the stiff words for words they'd actually say. They add one real detail the AI couldn't know, like something the buyer posted last week. The email goes out sounding like a person wrote it, because one did. The AI just got them moving.
One draft traps you. Three give you options to mix. Ask the AI for three takes, then pick the strongest one as your starting point.
"Write me three short versions of this email to a sales leader at meritt, each with a different angle."
Don't just tweak it. Read the best version, then say it the way you'd say it out loud. Your voice is the thing AI can't fake.
AI wrote "I hope this email finds you well." You write "Saw meritt just hired three reps. Quick question for you."
The opening line is what gets read or skipped. AI openers are almost always generic. Change that one line every single time, no exceptions.
Cut "I wanted to reach out regarding..." and start with the buyer's actual problem instead.
"Hi there, I hope this email finds you well. I wanted to reach out to discuss how meritt can help your organization streamline its hiring process and drive better outcomes across your team..." Delete. It says nothing and sounds like a robot.
"Hi Sam, saw meritt added three SDRs last month. Most teams that scale fast lose one or two early because the screening missed something. Is that a worry for you, or have you nailed it?" Same tool helped write it. But a human cut it down and pointed it at Sam.
The strong one is shorter, it names a real thing, and it sounds like a person. That's the whole difference. The AI did the heavy lifting. You did the part that matters.
You've got this when every AI draft is a starting point, not a finished email. Check yourself on your next send. Did you read the whole thing? Did you change the first line? Does it sound like you? If yes, you're there. AI isn't going away, and the sellers who win aren't the ones who avoid it or lean on it blindly. They're the ones who edit. That's a skill you'll use for years.
Yes, but only as a first draft. AI is great for getting words on the page fast and beating writer's block. The mistake is sending what it gives you without editing. Use the draft to start, then rewrite it in your own voice and add one real detail about the buyer. That keeps your emails fast to write and still personal.
Rewrite the first line and cut the filler. AI openers like "I hope this email finds you well" are dead giveaways, so swap them for the buyer's actual problem or something they posted recently. Then read the whole thing out loud and change any words you wouldn't really say. One real, specific detail beats a page of polished fluff.
No. Refusing to use AI just makes you slower than the reps who do. The bad habit isn't using AI, it's sending its work unread. Good sellers ask AI for a draft, then own the edit. Think of it as a fast junior helper that gets you moving, while you stay the final author of anything that goes out.
Always rewrite at least the first line, and usually more. A good rule is to make three versions, pick the best, then say it your own way. Cut anything stiff or vague, and add one thing the AI couldn't know about the buyer. If the email still sounds like a robot wrote it, you haven't edited enough yet.
£7-10k flat fee. The methodology, delivered.
See Hire with Assessment